Walkthrough where is 2010




















The Packers are showing blitz, as usual, with Charles Woodson 21 threatening on the offensive right side. Tomlinson does an excellent job of pass protection, and Sanchez has plenty of time to throw. Keller runs a crossing route, but Sanchez has his eyes on a bigger play: Hawk is trying to run up the seam with Cotchery, which is the kind of mismatch quarterbacks dream about.

Sanchez makes the right read, but he also waits for the play to develop, pump-faking and waiting for defenders to commit. There are plenty of safeties in Cotchery's vicinity, but one has deep responsibility against Holmes, and the other shown in red wants to jump a pass to Keller. It's hard to tell where Sanchez is looking and pumping on this play, but he clearly keeps the defense from converging, and he waits until Cotchery gets deep separation from Hawk. Cotchery picks up 49 yards, but the scoring opportunity is squandered by a missed field goal.

Sanchez completed several long passes during Sunday's game, but he also missed several chances to get the Jets in the end zone. One of the most mysterious mistakes occurred late in the fourth quarter, with the Jets down by six and facing third-and-8 from the yard line.

I don't like Schottenheimer's call on this play -- four receivers releasing into deep routes, with Tomlinson staying in to block Figure 4. This is either two-down territory or "set up the field goal" territory. Either way, having one or two receivers crossing in front of the sticks isn't a bad idea.

But the Jets send everyone deep, and the Packers respond by rushing three defenders and playing a very deep variation of quarters coverage. Not surprisingly, Sanchez can't find anyone open, so he throws a prayer to Cotchery in the corner of the end zone. The pass is nearly picked off. As the diagram shows, Edwards is wide open in the back of the end zone. The replay shows him coming over from the middle of the field, just in case the pass is tipped in the air. There is no defender near him, and no defender in the zone he's running from.

I watched this replay about 20 times and counted the Packers defenders twice. On a play like this, the "wide open" receiver usually isn't wide open; his defender left him at the throw. That's not the case here. Tramon Williams breaks up the play for the Packers, and he is clearly the defender assigned to Cothchery's zone, the only one in position to make the play. Nick Collins , the deep safety, is 15 yards in front of Edwards, so there's no way he was covering Edwards through the back of the end zone before turning to defend the throw.

Collins appears to have reacted to Keller, who crossed the middle and turned upfield. Woodson, covering an underneath zone, must have turned Edwards loose to Collins and Williams.

At some point, Edwards had to have gotten a step on the defenders, and Sanchez wasn't rushed. But he never found the open receiver. Sunday's shutout was an example of five or six things going simultaneously wrong for the Jets. That was bound to happen, because everything went just right for them for most of the season. Their top priority, after burning a few of the wackier pages from Schottenheimer's playbook, must be to make sure that Sanchez is willing to find and throw to deep receivers.

One yard bomb per game could mean the difference between a Jets team and the Super Bowl participant they believe they are. Sanchez can't leave those opportunities on the field. There's nothing wrong with interviewing yourself, as long as you're willing to ask the tough questions.

Randy Moss claimed that he would interview himself after Sunday's loss to the Patriots, and I was momentarily thrilled. If anyone deserved a Barbara Walters-style couch session with Moss, it was Moss. His internal dialogues are far more interesting than our external ones. Alas, there was no real interview, just a rambling monologue, one that got him booted from the Vikings and onto the waiver wire.

A self-interview can be an important step toward self-discovery, but there has to be some give-and-take. Moss needs to bring a Mortimer Snerd puppet with him to press conferences, or do a Moss-not-Moss routine where he puts on glasses when he wants to be the interviewer but takes them off to respond. He also needs to decide the style of the interview. The Barbara Walters method works best for misunderstood artists like Moss, but it's not the only way to poke around inside that Veg-o-matic of a psyche.

If he wants to fulfill his interview obligations without pesky interference from the outside world, Moss could try some of the following interview techniques at his next stop. Moss : Randy, we're a corporation that's under a lot of pressure to "win now," so to speak. Your resume certainly outlines your strengths. What would you say is your biggest weakness? Randy : I'm too driven, too hard working, and too committed to getting the job done!

Plus, I hate it when, you know, a company leaves a lot of good ideas in the board room, because, like, no one listens to Randy, then they tell Randy later, "Hey, you had some good ideas back there," but they didn't listen. It kind of hurts, right? This is also quick, but better at getting to the root of a person's feelings.

It also approximates the waivers experience pretty well -- so many desperate suitors, so little time. Given five minutes to find a soul mate, could Randy Moss really find Randy : Oh, I love the sweater you are wearing.

Such an interesting style. Is that from Hollister? Randy : Have you seen any good movies? I hope the American studios don't butcher it. Moss : I am feeling suffocated. You are coming on too strong. This is like a roller coaster. Randy : What are your hobbies? I try to go skiing at least twice every winter, I love to rollerblade, and I have a passion for knitting.

It's good for exposing ugly truths left , just making yourself look like a jackass right , or seamlessly integrating a little of both center , making it highly Moss-ready. Moss : Randy, Randy! What do you hate football fans? Why do you question Brad Childress' right to exist?

Moss : Randy, what did that caterer ever do to you? Their food was great! Delicious, in fact! I had a whole roast before I came here! Why do you insist on squandering your ability? Do you think you're a terrible role model, or just a lousy one? Randy : I'm not going to answer that. I don't even know what that symbolizes. It's the opposite of confrontational. We have two hours of airtime, and you have an unbearable album of folk songs to promote, so feel free to swan dive into your own navel for a while.

Moss : In muted tones Your work with the Vikings was a radical departure from your earlier efforts with the Patriots, and it's really a clean break from what you did a decade ago with the Vikings.

That was more of an ensemble piece, but your new games have a very different vibe to them, different textures, a more nuanced ambience.

Can we expect to see even more exploration in the next phase of your career? Randy : In even more muted tones Yes, well I reached a dead end with the Patriots, you know, and I just I've been reading a lot of philosophy, you know, and contemplating the interconnectivity of things. I think my new material reflects that, it's more about -- an essence, if you will -- than it is about catching passes or winning games. Of course, Moss isn't the only one in need of introspection. Brad Childress needs a self-interview, as does Vikings owner Zygi Wilf.

They can ask themselves what they expected when they traded for Moss, ask why they would want him if their tomfoolery tolerance is so low that they can't take one rambling interview. Plus the great Catering Debacle of , which could easily have been solved by having Pat Williams sit on him for the rest of the meal.

They can look in the mirror and ask how badly Brett Favre will have to get injured before they realize that no one is benefitting from his efforts, least of all Favre. A little incisive self-query could go a long way toward calling an end to the doomed experiment that was the season.

Childress might also realize that, like Moss, he may be better off elsewhere. Not that the decision is his. Somewhere between self-delusion and self-absorption, there's a place where the Vikings may find a little truth. The Phanatic Code is running a little behind schedule, but it is running.

I will be working through November to put the finishing touches on my moody valentine to Philly sports heroes and their fans. Climb up onto it and jump off the screen to your right.

You will land on the raised platform in the east courtyard. From there you can continue to your right through the door. Subscribe and get daily new escape games by email.

Please read our Commenting Rules before posting your comment! Posting walkthrough links to YouTube and other sites is forbidden! Please report any spam or unwanted comment by contacting us. Home » Escape Games » Where is ? Walkthrough Where is ? Advertisement Where is ? You had no idea I was preparing this. Things kind of got out of control and voila — a minigame called Where is ?

Play This Game. Can't figure it out. And I love Mateusz Skutnik!!! Happy new year to you all. This comment has been removed by the author. I cannot even find 27 anymore only I have tried 4 times and come up with the same outcome.

There is something you need to do down there. So fun! I got 27 coin things and a Happy New Year table at end. Happy New Year All! Post a Comment Please read our Commenting Rules before posting your comment! Weekly Most Popular Games. SD Hooda Escape California Warning: This site requires the use of scripts, which your browser does not currently allow. See how to enable scripts. SharePoint Walkthrough Guide. Choose the download you want.

Download Summary:. Total Size: 0. Back Next. Microsoft recommends you install a download manager. Microsoft Download Manager. Manage all your internet downloads with this easy-to-use manager.

It features a simple interface with many customizable options:. Download multiple files at one time Download large files quickly and reliably Suspend active downloads and resume downloads that have failed.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000