The probationer must keep his assigned officer informed of basic facts, including his address and place of employment. If a probationer wants to move, the officer first must approve the new address. For instance, a convicted sex offender on probation cannot live within a certain proximity to schools, so his probation officer would veto a new residence too close to an elementary school.
Probationers typically are assigned some sort of community service work, such as helping at a non-profit organization or cleaning up parks and streets.
If a probationer does not complete her required community service hours, her probation officer can revoke the probation and return her to court.
In many jurisdictions, probationers can be required to provide DNA samples and submit to drug testing at the discretion of their probation officer.
Most probationers are restricted to a limited geographic area. If they want to travel out of the state, either for work or a vacation, they must get permission from their probation officer.
It is very difficult to move to a different state while on probation. In some cases, probation may not include any of the aforementioned requirements, but rather simply be bench probation.
In any event, if you have received SIS probation in Missouri, in order to keep a conviction off your record, you must complete all the requirements of your probation, including paying all the appropriate fees, fines, and court costs. If you or a loved one is facing a criminal charge in Missouri or have violated the terms of your probation, it is imperative to call an experienced St. Research has demonstrated that the year-olds are still experiencing major changes in the brain that result in heightened impulsive behavior, risk taking, and poor decision- making.
This age group is typically less successful in complying with the orders of the court compared to older adult offender populations. The increasing number of females involved in the criminal justice system, and the scarcity of programs and services that are geared toward their specialized needs, has prompted criminal justice professionals to examine their sanctioning and supervision processes in terms of gender.
Although there is more extensive data regarding the characteristics of women in prisons and jails, there is far less information on female offenders in community correctional settings.
The neglect of women in criminal justice research has previously been justified on the grounds that they account for only a small fraction of arrests and commit fewer crimes than males. This justification ignores the fact that women who do enter the justice system, while fewer in number and less violent than their male counterparts, often become extensive users of the system and have extensive and complex needs.
In focusing on the overwhelming number of males in the criminal and juvenile justice systems, programs, policies and services often fail to develop a diversity of options for dealing with the gender and culturally-specific problems of female offenders enmeshed in the system.
0コメント