Nothing is across the board. I'm virtually never in favor of that. I realize there are circumstances where virtually everyone is, but this definitely isn't one of those cases.
It simply has to be determined on a case-by-case basis. Take murder for example. Most are against it, I would assume. However, it depends for me. If you feel this person should cease to live, so you kill them; I'm against it. However, if you feel this way because he molested your daughter, then I'll sell you the ammunition.
Obvisouly, there are conflicting ideas behind our example of murder. So, it's obviously not across the board. The fact of the matter is; whether it's immoral, unethical or illegal, you have to be willing to face the consequences. While this leaves a door open for sociopaths to do crazy things, this is as across-the-board as this issue will ever get. But you have to be willing to face any potential consequences. Joined: Mar 14, Messages: Likes Received: When and if it is morally wrong break laws you do not agree with?
I don't think it's a moral issue. Let's say you feel that somebody you don't like ought to die,so you murder him. Is it morally right to murder someone just because you don't agree with the law? Morals are determined by the majority. If the majority doesn't think that something is right,then it becomes a moral issue. It's been the same throughout history. Slavery,Women's rights,Abortion,etc. So in a way,I don't believe in morals,just what I feel is right and wrong.
Morals are just something the people in power cook up for the public to conform to. It depends. Martin Luther King Jr. The suffrage movement didn't have to break any laws to get women the power to vote. In the case of a democracy,or in a case where the government listens to the people,all you have to do is have a voice and a reasonable explanation. But,in the case of a totalitarian regime,then yes,breaking the law seems to be the best way to protest. Joined: Mar 26, Messages: 13, Likes Received: 3, Well, if you want to be technical about it, disobeying laws you don't agree with was generally how the United States became a country in the first place.
Generally speaking, however, it's a complex question. Despite the fact that they peformed some downright despicable acts, they're still sort of admired because they went against a system that many ordinary Americans felt had failed or just simply didn't give a shit about them. They're still thought of in lots of ways as folk heroes. Were they right for what they did? It's easy to say no but, then again, most of us living today weren't alive in those times in which modern conveniences and even laws that we have today and take for granted would have seemed like miracles in From a legal standpoint, Americans have always been encouraged to stand up against laws that they don't agree with.
That's what the entire concept of jury nulification is all about. That means that criminal trials and charges aren't strictly by the letter of the law. If it was, then the system as we know it wouldn't exist. Ordinary people have to not only look at the evidence given in a trial, they also have to look at the people involved, how evidence was collected, etc.
They have to look at the circumstances surrounding why a person may have done whatever it is that they did. Some people can be downright guilty as hell for what they've been charged with, a jury knows it but will sometimes aquit because they simply don't agree that the person should've been charged with the crime or that this person simply did what they had to do.
Then you've got the other side of the issue. How many people that've bombed abortion clinics or killed doctors that performed abortions have claimed that they were defying an unjust law? That they were saving the lives of innocent children everywhere from mass murderers? How many crackheads desperate for their next fix, people that've decided that they'll put whatever they want into their bodies regardless of the law, have robbed and killed so said crackheads can get what they need?
JGlass Unregistered User. Joined: Feb 16, Messages: 0 Likes Received: 2, Ricky said all there really is to say. Unless there is an objective morality I personally don't believe there is an objective morality , the situation varies completely on a case to case basis. Firstly, are they breaking the laws in hopes that the laws will change, or in hopes that they simply won't get caught? There are plenty of people who smoke weed who attempt to get the laws changed, but I'd say the majority of pot smokers are quite content to just keep on smoking weed behind closed doors.
Additionally, there are some that nobody in their right mind believes are unjust, like laws against murdering people. However, there are people out there who do kill for their own sick pleasure. There's no way you can say this type of law breaking is morally acceptable. On the other hand, where would be without the countless numbers of blacks who broke unjust laws during the Civil Rights movement? Where would be without the hippies who burnt their draft cards?
Personally I believe it is ok to break the law when it interferes with personal freedom or offends you to the point where you want to fight it in any way possible.
For example, many people did not agree with slavery, which was law long ago. Many people broke the law and help slaves escape capture. Another example is you are unhappy with a law passed by congress and you decide to block the doors to a government agency. Under these conditions I agree with breaking the law. Young Sheck Wes and I'm getting really rich ching-ching See how I caught it 'cause I'm really with the shits bang-bang See me in the streets and I be really with a cling, Cling , With a Bad bitch bitch , Niggas straight rocking rock Niggas straight see me, When they see me, They be coppin' what?
With the motherfucking dope Dope with the motherfucking dope With the motherfucking dope bitch With the dope getting rich , With my bros bitch, Shit I fucked your ho shit And she ain't even let you know she fucked up Damn, This nigga nice, Fuck is you talking about? Mayonnaise, Informally mayo, Is a thick cold sauce or dressing usually used in sandwiches and composed salads. It is a stable emulsion of oil, Egg yolk, And acid, Either vinegar or lemon juice.
There are many variants using additional flavorings. A "mayonnaise de poulet" is mentioned by a traveler to Paris in , But not described. It is almost never acceptable to break the law. Most of the laws are there to protect us and others so breaking it can cause pain for many different people. No matter the crime it is better to avoid it and learn a legal way to do it than risk getting hurt. If you foot in a foot, Then proceed to foot that foot into another foot, Then you go fishing with that foot as bait.
That fishes foot gets footed by three more feet. Now you understand what goes on in my mind every day. I believe ur hairline is far back. I am adopted can someone plz adopt me because i need a hair cut because people are making fun of my hairline and it is not funny. After that happens i go cry my self to sleep and think about how to be adopted by someone "cough cough maybe you can adopt me cough cough".
I agree that laws should never be broken under any circumstances because laws are there to keep us safe and are meant to help us. Hhsdhcsdhcs hjcsjhvkashhajhsjhasdjhsdjhksjhdjhdjddjd jd jd jcsjhcs jcsjhv hjvjhxc hvxc jhvd jhvdh jve jhvejhvdjhv hjovhjvjhd vjd vjh vjhcxjhojhjhohocohxhuh icchjhhh h h h h h h h h h h o uhc h c chu odivd hd0dv ioddiovhixcpoia ioadpd d i ioadiidob[uis VHdiiicd i h iov v v iv i hi ui uuiyhy uhiuigu yuuio.
It is never okay to break the law because you could danger someone when you decide to break the law. If everyone in the world did not follow the laws that are set, our world would be dangerous. Certain laws are set for a certain reason. If life or death situation, call the police.
Laws are set for a reason so follow them. Remember everyone has a different opinion! I understand that it is good to save someone's life. I'm not a bad person, these are just the LAWS that we are talking about. Even if you are saving someone's life you are still breaking the rules like the murder trying to kill the person you are trying to save.
I went in a bus lane before when an ambulance went past and the next day I got a letter through with a fine but luckily the ambulance was in the picture I was basically helping someone survive and if the ambulance wasn't in the picture I would have got a fine. It can be okay. Just like other people said,some people may do it to hurt someone but if you actually have to break the law in a emmergency,it can be okay to break the law to help someone else to break it.
Don't feel like you can't break it if is wrong but for a good cause. The laws are there to protect us so why would people stop that.
Also we have human rights for a reason which is also to protect us witch nobody should have the rights to stop. People who commit a crime when always hurt people around them witch it never okay.
0コメント