I am just thinking "how would I do it if I were them". What do you mean by "lose the affects of those links"? I ask because I recently released some free software that is related to one of my websites.
The software is taking off and I'm getting a lot of links in a short period of time. Although they are completely natural links the number in a short period isn't the "natural" pattern my site has experienced in the past. Am I going to get the benefit of the new links? If there is some penalty will it ever be lifted?
Will the new links ever count? Getting quality links in a short period of time dosent mean that they are all bad links.. I meant that if you buy links from a service that forces you to link to another site or guarantees links, the search engines might not give you credit for obtaining those links.
It all depends on how the links were obtained. A large spike in the number of links obtained might not indicate an attempt to spam. My point is that you don't want to do anything that will give the search engines a reason to penalize you.
If you are obtaining a high volume of links through proper and ethical methods, you are probably not going to receive a penalization. However, it can happen. It happened to us last year on a site that has a legitimate reason to link up with sites in a multitude of genres and we got slapped..
We had to beg and plead our case to get back in. They put the site back in the index but the PR is still zero. Back on topic.. If you launch a great new product and you get alot of links quickly, the search engines are smart enough to discern good practices from bad practices. What penalty? This word penalty is thrown around way too much. There's a difference between not ranking and being penalized. What I see, and what was mentioned in one of the conferences I think New Orleans , is that if you get a burst of links it could be interpreted as a newsworthy but temporary event and you'll get a temporary boost.
I'm certain there are other considerations to keep in mind re quality and neighborhoods, as well as if you are participating in triangular linking schemes, exchanging or receiving links from a closed network etc. There are some interesting bits of information out there in regards to this type of link strategy.
You'll most likely do more harm than good and my personal opinion is that it is an "absolute waste of time". New site, "unnatural" number of inbound links compared to other sites in the same space. That number of links grew "unnaturally" over a "short" period of time.
You won't get too far utilizing that type of linking strategy. You might get some short term juice but in the long run, it will work against you. Don't be afraid to cultivate links at whatever pace you can. That's what you'd do if search engines didn't exist, right?
BUT, don't just hunt for any old link you can get. Focus on relevance, relevance, relevance. Approach your link development with the mindset that your goal is to reach targeted users directly from those links. That also is what you'd do if search engines didn't exist. I can't prove this, but I often think the main timing problem to worry about is that being in too much of a hurry leads to sloppy work.
When sites report problems from gaining too many links too fast, I often suspect that the real problem is scattershot theming.
If you have lots of links but not enough are coming from places where the relevance is clear, that will send a confused message to the search engines regardless of timing. When people link to a site without being asked, they do it because something matches their own interests.
If a site gains links naturally, the timing could be anything but the links will reflect some sort of common interest. A natural "link footprint" will develop discernible themes in the overall topics of the pages that link to you.
The more closely those themes match your own targets, the better, although it won't hurt to have a few odd fish in the mix. It takes time to focus on relevance and quality, so if you work at building links that would make good sense to users, timing issues will likely take care of themselves. How many links should you be building? How fast should you be building links to your website? In essence, over What happens if you build too many links too fast?
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More. Close Privacy Overview This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website.
Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. Hit enter to search or ESC to close.
Close Search. Teji July 15, November 16th, 5 Comments. What counts as a good link? At what speed should you ideally be building links to your website? I would go for something like: Month 1 — build 10 inbound links to your homepage Month 2 — build 15 inbound links a mix between homepage and internal page links Month 3 — build 30 inbound links mix it up again Month 4 — build 40 inbound links just internal pages Month 5 — build 40 or more links a month just internal pages again Month 6 — build all the high-quality links you can still only internal pages.
Rodolfo says:. March 10, at pm. July 17, at am. Vladislav says:. October 13, at pm. Kickboxing gloves says:. For instance, your typical blog post might get views, 10 retweets and 3 Facebook Likes. On this particular day, your blog post got 1, views, 52 retweets and counting! Of course not! Why would you tell people to stop doing that? Every time someone shares your post on a social site it creates a social signal, which influences rank in the SERPs.
0コメント